Keep it simple copywriting logos
Help a Reporter Out website

How to get backlinks from HARO (and other similar sites)


Getting backlinks is a massive pain in the proverbial. There, I said it.

You have to create great content, and you have to persuade high-quality websites to link to your content too.

And it looks like I’m in good company – one-fifth of marketers say getting backlinks is the most challenging part of SEO!

The good news? There is a relatively easy way to get backlinks and establish yourself as a thought leader in your chosen industry.

Introducing the humble pitching platform. You can use platforms like HARO to identify backlink opportunities and boost your presence in the search engines.

New to the concept of HARO? I’ll explain what it’s all about, some good HARO alternatives, as well as how to create a pitch that publishers love.

But first…

The importance of backlinks

You can split SEO into three main components.

  • Technical SEO, which is all about optimising your website for speed and crawlability
  • On-page SEO, which concerns page readability and using the right keywords
  • And off-page SEO, which is all about SEO that happens off your website. A big part of this is backlinks

So why are backlinks to other websites so important for SEO?

Search engines like Google want to prioritise the most trustworthy, credible content. After all, they don’t want to promote dodgy web pages!

Backlinks act as a vote of confidence in your website. If another website links to yours, it shows the search engines that you’re a reliable source of information. So, the more links you get from relevant, high-quality sites, the more your SEO gets a boost.

According to Ahrefs, two-thirds of web pages don’t have any backlinks, so if you get at least one, you can get a significant advantage over your competitors in Google!

This leads us nicely onto how to use HARO for backlinks.

What is HARO?

Help a Reporter Out website

HARO stands for Help a Reporter Out. It’s a website that connects publishers like journalists, bloggers, PR specialists, and writers with potential sources.

(Technically, it’s now called Connectively, but nobody calls it that. It’s like how everyone still calls X Twitter.)

Here’s how HARO works:

  • A publisher looking for a quote for a piece of content puts out a request on HARO looking for sources
  • HARO then collates all the requests and emails them to the sources that subscribe to the service
  • Sources can then reply to publishers with their quotes. If the publisher likes the quote, they’ll use it in their content
  • As a thank you for using the quote, the publisher will typically include a link back to the source’s website

HARO (as well as the other alternatives in this article) is free at the basic level for both publishers and sources. However, you can pay extra for additional services like specialist alerts and support finding the right pitches.

I’ll be brutally honest: I’m not a big fan of HARO from a publisher’s perspective. While I’ve got pitches from it, they’ve not been amazing. Because it’s the most well-known pitching platform and the one people gravitate to, it tends to get flooded with low-quality content and people looking for a quick and easy way to get backlinks.

With this in mind, here are some HARO alternatives I think you might like.

Alternatives to HARO


Qwoted website

Qwoted is probably the platform most like HARO on this list, but the responses I have got are of a much better quality. One of the benefits of Qwoted from a publisher’s perspective is that you can reach out to experts on the platform and see if they want to respond to your request, meaning you can be more proactive.

The customer service is pretty good too – I’ve had to message Qwoted a few times, and they always get back to you quickly.

Help a B2B Writer

Help a B2B Writer website

I get a lot of mileage from Help a B2B Writer as it’s geared more towards digital marketers like me. I’d probably say about 75% of all the sources I get are from here.

It’s easy to use as a publisher as you don’t need to create an account – just fill in the form, and you get an email when someone responds to your request. You do have to create an account if you want to register as a source, but it’s super straightforward to do. 

You do get a lot of emails though, especially if you sign up to multiple categories. I recommend creating a filter on your inbox so you’re not deluged with requests!


Sourcebottle website

Sourcebottle – you’ve gotta love the name right?

This HARO alternative works very similarly to Help a B2B Writer. While you have to sign up to see all of the pitches, you can see a few examples on the website – if you’re on the fence about signing up, this is a good way to see if Sourcebottle is right for you.

From a source’s perspective, everything is well-segmented, meaning you’re more likely to get pitches that are relevant to your business.

How to increase the chances of a publisher using your quote

So you’ve signed up to all the pitching platforms; now how do you get those all-important quotes and links?

I’ve been on both sides of the process as a source and a publisher. This means I know what you need to do to boost the odds of getting your quote picked up.

Here are my top tips for using HARO and other similar sites to get backlinks.

Read the request and make sure it’s relevant

One of the things I’ve noticed when asking for requests is that the same names pop up every single time, even if your pitch is totally irrelevant to them.

Case in point – I put out a request asking for plumbers to advise how they use SEO to improve their search engine presence. I got a response from a personal trainer from an American chain of gyms.

Unless you’re unblocking toilets in your spare time, I don’t want to know.

Read the request thoroughly and make sure it’s something you want to provide a quote for before putting a response together. You get a lot of pitches come through on platforms like HARO, so you don’t have to respond to every single one.

It’s also important to include all the relevant information. I once put out a pitch for examples of websites – a surprising amount of people totally forgot to include a link to their site! 

If a publisher gets a lot of responses, they’re not going to spend time chasing you up for missing details.

It’s also important to remember that getting a link on a website unrelated to your business can hurt your backlinking efforts. Low-quality and irrelevant links are considered link spam in Google, potentially leading to your site being demoted in the rankings.

Respond promptly (but not too fast)

Most articles with tips for pitching will recommend that you respond as soon as possible (within thirty minutes to an hour) to increase your chances of being chosen as a source.

I’m going to come at this from a completely different angle and a potentially controversial one. As long as you send your quote in by the deadline, that’s what counts.

Will some publishers want a quote ASAP? Yes, especially if they need a quote for a publication like a daily newspaper. However, the majority of publishers will try to give sources as much time as possible to respond so they can get high-quality quotes. This takes the pressure off and means you can take your time crafting a solid response.

Personally, I’d rather wait a day for a decent quote than five minutes for a half-arsed one.

In fact, responding too quickly on sites like Help a Reporter Out can put you at a disadvantage. It can make it look like you’ve submitted a generic copy-and-paste response or used AI, which is a massive no-no. I’ll talk about AI in more detail later.

Too quick to respond messsage

While I can’t speak for everyone who asks for quotes, in most situations, I wait until the deadline has passed. I then read through all the responses and choose the ones I want to use. This means responding first doesn’t necessarily provide any significant benefits.

Is it worth responding after a deadline has passed? You’d be surprised how many people do. Case in point, I specified a cut-off of Monday 5pm for my last article. By Tuesday morning, I’d had about six emails come through after the deadline.

Interestingly, it always seems to be the same people who reply late, making me think that there is some kind of strategy to doing so. Either that, or they’re just collectively bad at time-management.

In my opinion though, it’s a massive gamble. Unless the publisher is running late creating their article or you have a quote that will blow their socks off, the chances are that your pitch is going to be ignored.

Just wait for the next pitch request to come along. Trust me, you won’t be sat there twiddling your thumbs for long.

Offer something that nobody else can

Once I asked sources to provide their top tips for doing SEO.

Most of the responses were generic things I could have found on the first page of Google. Do keyword research, write high-quality content, submit guest articles… If it’s not going to wow me, it’s not going to wow my client.

I then got a quote from someone talking about local SEO and how it’s often overlooked in the SEO process. They explained how they created a Google Business Profile for a client and went into detail about the tangible results they got, like how much web visits and booked appointments increased by.

That quote got my interest and was the one that I used.

The person you’re pitching to will get many quotes, and 99% of them will talk about the exact same things. Do a little reverse psychology – imagine what your nearest competitor would say and talk about something different.

Statistics and tangible data increase your chances of being chosen on sites like HARO too. After all, what sounds better?

  • We increased the number of leads we received
  • We increased the number of leads we received by 125% over three months

Say something that makes you stand out, not blend in.

Keep it short and quotable

Journalists and other publishers want concise, snackable quotes that slot nicely into the content they are writing. If you send a 1,000-word essay, they’re going to scan through it, sigh, and move quickly onto the next pitch.

Keeping it short and quotable works in your best interests too. The longer your quote, the more likely the publisher is to trim it down and amend it to use it. This increases the risk of you potentially being misquoted.

How long should your pitch be? In my experience, keep it to less than 150 words, about the length of this header section.

Here’s a top tip for getting backlinks – include your contact details at the bottom of your message. That way, if the publisher has any follow-up questions or wants you to expand on what you’ve discussed, they can easily get in touch.

Don’t use AI

A short while ago on LinkedIn, I read a post from a frustrated content writer. They’d submitted a request on HARO, which someone had responded to. They used the quote in the article they were creating, and all was right with the world.

Or so they thought. 

They’d been duped by some schemer who had ‘tricked’ them into using a quote generated using AI. They then created and distributed a report shaming the content writer (and others) for accepting a quote written with AI.

I won’t link to the report because the last thing that person needs is more publicity. They need a short, sharp kick in the balls.

This is an extreme example, and I’m sure everyone using AI isn’t that duplicitous. However, generating a quote using AI is not a sensible approach. Publishers want quotes from real people, not computer algorithms.

Here’s a quote I received from someone on HARO. Look at this wording and tell me it wasn’t generated using Chat GPT. It says too much without saying anything at all.

AI generated quote from HARO

You get what you put in with websites like HARO. Make the effort, and you’re more likely to make the cut. Spend twenty seconds knocking together an AI-generated quote, and you’ll go into the ‘rejected’ pile.

Some HARO alternatives actually give publishers a heads-up if they think a source used AI. For example, this message pops up on Qwoted if it spies generative AI. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

AI warning

Don’t waste people’s time

Want to get a publisher hot under the collar and say? Here are some of the worst things you can do when submitting a quote:

Try and set up a Zoom or Teams interview

Publishers want quick quotes and they want them in a hurry. 

Unless they specifically ask to interview someone over the phone or video communication software, don’t try and arrange something. Chances are that they won’t have the time to accommodate you.

Respond in another language

You would be surprised how often this happens! Unless you’re told otherwise, always respond in the language of the publisher’s request. 

If a publisher doesn’t speak Spanish they’re not going to waste their time running your quote through Google Translate ¿Comprendes?

Sell your products or services

Publishers know you’re not giving a quote out of the generosity of your heart – you want a backlink in exchange for your time.

However, you should never try and shill your product or service directly in your quote. This is glaringly obvious and means the publisher will have to hack your quote to bits to get something they can use.

Send a link to an article or page on your website

Every time I ask for a quote on a particular topic, I get at least one person that just sends a link to a similarly-themed article on their own website saying, ‘I hope this is useful’.

Honest answer? It’s not. I can’t do anything with that, which means you go directly into the ‘rejection’ pile.

Ask pointless questions

Asking a pointless question on HARO

There may be times when you’re not sure you’ll be accepted as a potential source, and you want to message the publisher to get some clarification.

I understand that it takes time and effort to get something from the relevant person in your business, I honestly do. 

The issue with this is that publishers get lots of quotes from potential sources. This means most of the time they’re not going to have the time or inclination to get back to you.

My advice? Dive right in and answer the question to the best of your ability. If a publisher doesn’t use your quote, you’ve got something you can repurpose for another time.

Send lots of follow-up messages

I’ve lost count of the number of times people have connected with me on LinkedIn and sent me a message saying ‘so… are you using my quote or what?’ 

The majority of publishers get a lot of pitches, so they can’t feasibly contact everyone who reaches out. Most publishers (myself included) will send you a message if they use your quote.

So if you don’t hear anything, this means that your quote probably hasn’t been used on this occasion. Don’t sweat it, and move on to the next pitch. 

If you’ve been told that your quote is going to be used, no doubt you’ll be super-keen to know when your link will be published. However, if a publisher is working on behalf of a third-party, the decision is usually out of their hands. This means 99% of the time you’ll be told ‘I don’t know’.

Here’s a handy hint: sign up to Ahrefs Webmaster Tools or Google Search Console. Both of these platforms are free and show you links to your site. 

This means that if you don’t hear back from a publisher, you can see if your quote has resulted in a backlink.

Send a holding statement

Example of a holding statement

A holding statement is a message saying you’re interested in responding and you’ll send over a quote as soon as possible.

This approach just fills a publisher’s inbox with worthless emails. It’s also a futile endeavour – unless you’re trying to get a quote from a Kardashian, a publisher isn’t going to wait around for you. 

Just send the quote when you have it – no need to make an announcement.

Use a publisher’s email for sales purposes

This is the number one thing you can do if you want to tick off a writer, journalist, or blogger.

Some platforms hide a publisher’s email address, while others encourage you to directly respond to the publisher’s email. The problem with this approach is that some sources harvest the email addresses and add them to their mailing lists.

Do not do this under any circumstances. Not only can it get you into trouble from a data protection perspective (hello GDPR), but it’s an easy way to get ignored on pitching platforms like HARO. 

When you start annoying people, they’ll tune you out and won’t use your content.

Worst case scenario, they may complain to the platform and you might get kicked off.

What are the chances of your quote being used on HARO?

I can’t speak for everyone that uses pitching platforms like HARO, but I typically get about twenty-five to thirty pitches for each request I put out there.

As I generally only use one or two quotes each time, this puts your chances of your quote being used at between three and eight per cent. Not a fantastic percentage, but you can increase your chances of success by offering a well-written, unique, and relevant quote.

Don’t get disheartened if your quotes don’t get picked up and you don’t get those backlinks. Sometimes, it’s a matter of timing and publishers have to go with the first pitch they get. Ideas for content can get dropped at the last minute. Your quote might not quite match the tone of the article.

I speak from experience here – I’ve submitted a lot of quotes in the hope of getting HARO backlinks that have come to nothing at all.

All you can do is keep trying. When you get that coveted backlink, it will be worth your time.

So… is HARO worth it?

Pitching platforms like HARO can be a great way to get backlinks for your site quickly, but you need to put the effort in. It’s not just a case of sending a generic quote to multiple publishers and crossing your fingers.

Quality is better than quantity when it comes to link building. Choose requests that are relevant and that you’re an authority in, and you’ll be better equipped to craft a high-quality pitch.

If you’re on the fence, why not try signing up to one of the platforms on the list and seeing what type of requests you get? 

It’s all free, so you have nothing to lose.